
12:03 |
: It’s a chat!
|
12:03 |
: Has this season increased or decreased Justin Verlander’s odds of reaching 300 wins? This season feels like a median outcome to me, but curious if Zips sees something different.
|
12:04 |
: I don’t have ZiPS open, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s dropped a little bit
|
12:04 |
: Verlander matched his projections, but remember, he wasn’t at 50% to win 300 games
|
12:04 |
: He kinda needs to beat his win projections by a bit
|
12:05 |
: Enjoyed the milestone article looking 3,000 hits. Any other milestones that you’re planning to look at soon?
|
12:05 |
: Probably! I was originally just going to do multiple milestones, but as I wrote the piece, I really wanted to talk more specifically about Freddie Freeman so it became about hits
|
12:05 |
: Update on Padres playoff chances if they win out?
|
12:06 |
: Yeah, let me open
|
12:07 |
: But I’ll have to get back to it as it’ll take 15 mins
|
12:07 |
: The recent articles about Freddie Freeman had me looking at his player page. I was surprised to see he had a negative “Def” component in every season of his career. “Didn’t he win a gold glove?”, I thought. “Surely he has been an above-average defender at least once.”.
|
12:08 |
: Def contains the positional adjustment
|
12:08 |
: Has Soto vs Acuna rest of career changed after this season?
|
12:08 |
: Acuna’s back in tops with ZiPS
|
12:08 |
: Acuna’s 3 year ZIPS projections stealing no more than 28 bases over the next three seasons. Does Zips currently not consider the new SB-relevant rule changes when considering SB projections?
|
12:08 |
: Those are done preseason
|
12:09 |
: Damn, it cut off my previous question. Continued – So I looked at all first basemen from 2020-2023: out of 15 qualified 1B over those 4 seasons, not a single one has a positive “Def” score. Christian Walker “leads” at -7.8. Help me make sense of this. If the “Def” score is “Fielding and Positional Adjustment Combined (above average)” shouldn’t someone be above average by definition? It seems like right now it’s comparing first basemen to shortstops, and penalizing them for it. Someone has to play first – and some of those 1B will be better at it than others, right?
|
12:09 |
: It’s just putting the positional adjustment into the DEF
|
12:09 |
: I’ll reverse the question: how can a 1B *ever* have as much pure defensive value as an average SS?
|
12:12 |
: Year BA OBP SLG G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO HP SB CS + DR WAR 2024 .304 .398 .555 152 578 125 176 33 2 36 101 82 107 10 49 11 153 1 6.8
|
12:12 |
: that’s acuna
|
12:15 |
: Cody Bellinger has had a great season despite declining statcast data. However, looking closer, his barrel% and hardhit% are actually about the same as his post 2020 seasons if you look at them on a per AB basis instead of per batted ball. In this sense, his data is punishing him for making a lot more contact than he has in previous years. I don’t think he’s back to 2019 form, but is instead a much better version of the hitter he was in 2020-2022. How much of his performance is sustainable and does statcast need to adjust the way they present data?
|
12:15 |
: I’m a Bellinger skeptic in that he’s not really hitting the ball all that hard
|
12:16 |
: I mean yeah, it’s not perfect
|
12:16 |
: but his velocity numbers are still really low
|
12:17 |
: but even with better contact, it’s not really sustainable to have this big a diff
|
12:17 |
Stop pretending you have access to non-Public ZiPS projections. /s
: |
12:17 |
: heh
|
12:17 |
: It’s one of my favorite genres of tweet
|
12:18 |
: For those who are confused, there’s a certain, fairly obscure, type of social media user who is outraged that I keep claiming to have access to ZiPS projections that other people don’t. These people will occasionally try and explain to me how ZiPS works. Admittedly, when that starts, I will frequently egg them on.
|
12:19 |
: In 2022, Acuna stole 29 bases in 40 attempts (~73% success) and was credited with 4.8 BsR. This year, he’s at 67 SBs in 80 attempts (~84% success) and is at 5.0 BsR. The description that come sup when you mouse over BsR only explictly mentions SBs and CS, but I assume other baserunning events (pickoffs?) are considered. Has his baserunning really been so bad outside of the SB game that it more or less negates 38 SBs? Or would you say that there are pretty large error bars around that 4.8 BsR for 2023?
|
12:19 |
: BsR looks at other baserunning events
|
12:22 |
: It definitely hurts that he has the most pickoffs + baserunning outs this year, with 15
|
12:22 |
: (that’s not including CS)
|
12:23 |
: And it’s not from volume, he’s taken an extra base successfully this season less often than Carlos Santana or Austin Riley
|
12:24 |
: BR has him at 51% XBT.
|
12:25 |
: Carroll leads the league at 71%
|
12:25 |
: What does the future hold for James Outman? He’s an “old” rookie (26) but 3.9 fWAR ain’t too shabby.
|
12:25 |
: Should be a solid player for quite a while
|
12:25 |
: He just doesn’t have the as likely dizzying upside as some of the others
|
12:25 |
: Did ZiPS change Shohei’s projection over 5 or 10 years with the latest injury? If he only pitches a 50% starter load, or none at all, what’s he worth on the market for offense alone over 3/5/10 years?
|
12:25 |
: Yeah, I did it in Jay’s piece like a week ago
|
12:25 |
: Pads are 4.5 back with 9 to play, right? Those have got to be some pretty long odds. Especially since the SFGs are the only team ahead of them they can directly take games from.
|
12:25 |
: Oh yeah, it’s long
|
12:26 |
: If the Padres win out
|
12:26 |
![]() |
12:26 |
: Just finished running
|
12:28 |
: What’s wrong with the Cubs? Do you think their 45% playoff odds seems about right?
|
12:28 |
: If you hang on a sec, I can give you latest ZiPS update. I just have to remove the nine guarantee padres wins
|
12:29 |
: ZiPS says 47.5%
|
12:29 |
: That seems to be about right. It’s very coinflippy now
|
12:29 |
: Does ZiPS do opt-outs for projected contracts? (Are they called zOptouts? Because that sounds cool.) If so, does the robot think should Shohei Ohtani have an opt-out in his next deal?
|
12:30 |
: It doesn’t necessarily do that, though I can *evaluate* the opt-outs
|
12:30 |
: Opt-outs aren’t inherently good or bad; there’s a price at which it’s a great idea for a player and a price at which it’s not
|
12:30 |
: Fun fact I can’t use my last name in the show
|
12:30 |
: Do you see the yankees as having a systemic problem in player dev on the hitting side? I know most prospects don’t make it, but this many underperforming their projections based on translating minor league metrics raises an eyebrow
|
12:30 |
: I honeslty haven’t looked at this systemically
|
12:31 |
: a lot of guys like Bird and Austin didn’t exactly have wonderful projections
|
12:31 |
: As a Mets fan thinking about Senga’s success and Yamamoto potentially coming to MLB: what traits matter the most for translating success from Japan to MLB? Have they changed at all since the 90s?
|
12:31 |
: Generally speaking, the control pitchers that don’t strike guys out don’t turn out as well
|
12:31 |
: It’s no guarantee of course, but the pitchers who go more after hitters tend to do better
|
12:31 |
: Doesn’t the term “chili con carne” imply that meat is optional?
|
12:32 |
: Same with assless chaps. It’s to help the deluded.
|
12:32 |
: Does ZIPS think Brett Baty is gonna be a bust? Or is this year a temporary blip? Has Mauricio moved the needle at all on his projection going forward?
|
12:35 |
: He’s lost about 0.8 WAR per year in his long-term ZiPS projection
|
12:35 |
: ZiPS still sees him as league-averageish, but the ceiling’s been lowered
|
12:35 |
: What players are you most excited to see the next batch of ZiPS projections for? Why them?
|
12:35 |
: Hey, I do full runs monthly!
|
12:36 |
: Davis Schmidt is now up to 5th most 2024 WAR among Blue Jays hitters
|
12:36 |
: What are the chances Michael King follows Jeffrey Springs’ career path – long time reliever stretched out into very solid starter?
|
12:36 |
: I think there’s a real chance
|
12:37 |
: But I think it depends how much injury risk the Yankees feel like
|
12:39 |
: He hasn’t had TJ, but he’s had a couple significant elbow injuries
|
12:39 |
: and I keep getting images of Tony Saunders
|
12:39 |
What about Grayson’s second half? |
12:40 |
: Slooowly. ZiPS is more optimistic about Rodriguez
|
12:40 |
: Thank you for the computer images regarding my suggestion to elongate games by having the oddly aggressive Burger King mascot run on the field at arbitrary moments. That made me laugh. Does ZIPS think any of the Mets troika of Megill, Peterson and Butto can be a regular rotation option going forward?
|
12:42 |
: I don’t even remember the image!
|
12:42 |
: I do so many of those I forget the ones I do
|
12:43 |
: But here, have a new one
|
12:43 |
![]() |
12:44 |
![]() |
12:44 |
: I can’t find the answer to this (or, I’m not smart enough to understand the explanations that I find) – If you total Outs Above Average for all players at a position, shouldn’t it equal zero?
|
12:44 |
: It should!
|
12:45 |
: In our WAR process, our system automatically recenters to 0
|
12:45 |
: How will the ZiPs forecast for Altuve change after this year? He has defied his 2023 projections, but are his underlying numbers signaling a decline?
|
12:45 |
: still projects well, but ZiPS is worried about playing time
|
12:45 |
: We all understand your relationship with beans in chili: remove it to improve the end result. If you could remove one skillset from a current player to push them to the next level (e.g. force a switch hitter to hit from just one side, remove an awful pitch from someone’s repertoire, play DH instead of the field, etc), what and who would it be?
|
12:45 |
: I’m assuming I can’t remove a PERSONAL proclivity?
|
12:46 |
: Assuming so, I’d make Jordan Walker allergic to all baseball gloves so that he always DHs
|
12:46 |
: What is Zips saying about a reasonable contract for Pete Alonso? His HRs and RBIs continue to be robust, but the batting average and age/body type should be cause for longer term concern…
|
12:46 |
: ZiPS hasn’t changed much since I did this piece!
|
12:47 |
: Hasn’t that always been the case Re: Bellinger tho? even in 2019 his exit velo and batted ball data was much less impressive than his surface level power. It feels like there’s something currently unexplained with his ability to pull airborne contact. Definitely think there’s regression coming (he’s had a lot of fluky hits this year) but he’s always felt like a statistical outlier in that his best performances don’t match the underlying data
|
12:47 |
: But it was a lot better than it was now!
|
12:47 |
: Has this season made you more bullish or bearish on Elly DLC? Best moments were sensational, but day to day is troublesome
|
12:47 |
: About the same.
|
12:47 |
: Dusty dislikes Chas for being fat, yet he gifts him banana pudding (alongside bread pudding and rice pudding, the king of puddings)? Seems like dirty pool.
|
12:47 |
: Given the larger sample size, what does ZIPS think about Elly De La Cruz going forward?
|
12:47 |
: Really hasn’t moved a ton
|
12:47 |
: Is there a particular person that comes to mind the ZiPS just absolutely whiffed on their projections? Good or bad
|
12:47 |
: You mean year in year out?
|
12:47 |
: Nobody I can think of
|
12:48 |
: Though early ZiPS (pre 2010) was worse at figuring out who has a small weak contact inducement ability
|
12:48 |
: So it was really bad at Gryboski for awhile
|
12:48 |
: would you using zips to make bets be some sort of conflict of interest?
|
12:49 |
: Is it? It seems like we have the same interest
|
12:49 |
: and while I’ve sold data to books, it’s pretty much blind
|
12:49 |
: Now, I don’t do any betting on NL player awards anymore
|
12:50 |
: So that I’m not in a position where I have to abstain from participating in vote do to having a financial stake
|
12:50 |
: I hadn’t given it much thought since I’m not a heavy better, but Yelich’s breakout year, I had some decent sized bets on him being MVP and I would have had to turn down voting if I had been asked
|
12:50 |
: I think I was Cy that year
|
12:50 |
: Since you don’t vote for NL MVP this year, you’re at liberty to let us know who you would vote for. So lets hear it!
|
12:50 |
: NFI
|
12:50 |
: Acuna/Betts is razor close
|
12:52 |
: I might break a tie right now, like GageEHC on twitter, in Betts favor due to the additional positional flexibility which has some small amount of value that’s really hard to capture
|
12:52 |
: Have you had to update zips to allow for four digit wRCs to support Wyatt Langford’s updated projections?
|
12:52 |
: heh
|
12:54 |
: Wasn’t Wyatt Langford the name of that Bob Knepper character on an early episode of Star Trek TNG that was originally supposed to marry Troi as a child?
|
12:54 |
: Errr, Robert Knepper
|
12:57 |
: ZIPS actually translates his minor league line at 274/368/487, but that’s obviously NOT going to be the projection
|
12:57 |
: since we’re talkign 41 games
|
12:57 |
: Can Rich Hill reach 300 wins?
|
12:57 |
: If he does, then does winning 300 wins become Climbing Dick Mountain?
|
12:57 |
: I think you meant Davis Schneider, not Schmidt, unless the Blue Jays have another Davis Sch who is going to come out of nowhere.
|
12:57 |
: wtf did I call him Schmidt?
|
12:58 |
: Besides me being stupid
|
12:58 |
: Especially since his name was right there and I’ve referred to him plenty of times
|
12:58 |
![]() |
12:59 |
: I guess technically fourth best Jay since Chapman isn’t signed
|
12:59 |
offended and disrespected the Baltimore Orioles by your low preseason projection of their team. Obviously there is no need for a trial because you and ZiPS are guilty of this malicious crime. What should your punishment be?
: You have greatly |
12:59 |
: I can only eat crab cakes and pit beef for a year
|
12:59 |
: Is MJ Melendez a bust? Should the royals already be thinking abt trading Bobby Witt Jr.?Should the royals just be contracted?
|
12:59 |
: Yes. No. Yes.
|
12:59 |
: How crazy has Royce Lewis’ grand slam binge been? He won’t continue that pace but it is amazing to finally get to see him play again, pending current injury status…
|
12:59 |
: Wyatt Langford – poor murdered character from Ozark
|
12:59 |
: Apparently it was wyatt Miller
|
1:00 |
: I always assume when zips disagrees with me you are just fudging the numbers to drive bettors to push the line in one direction so you can bet the opposite way afterwards.
|
1:00 |
: That would be an amazing long con
|
1:00 |
: Is there any data out there that can confirm MLB actively ruling less fielding mistakes as errors? I am convinced this is all a ploy to raise batting average so they can say their rule changes are helping the game (as I sit here in my tinfoil hat eating lunch).
|
1:00 |
: I’m not sure there’s a great way to do this
|
1:00 |
: because you basically have to track the “shoulda been errors”
|
1:00 |
: FWIW, last time I checked statcast’s baserunning metric (which doesn’t take into account SBs but does take into account batted ball data) views Acuna as a good bit more valuable on the basepaths than the UBR and wGDP components of BsR suggest. No clue why fangraphs hasn’t made the switch over yet
|
1:00 |
: Acuna is being penalized because he’s on base in front of Riley/Olson/etc who all have some of the highest hard hit %s in the league. Harder to take the extra base on a ball hit 100+mph than on one hit 80mph
|
1:01 |
: As noted, we still have GDP in there last I checked
|
1:01 |
: thing is, it should be in there somewhere, just not necessarily in BSR
|
1:02 |
: Unless you’re modeling the rate at which you’re turning shouldabeen GDPs into fielders choices
|
1:02 |
: Do you have any words that can give Sox fan a glimmer of hope until Reinsdorf is no longer in the picture? Because it’s feeling pretty bleak right now on the south side.
|
1:02 |
: Bourbon
|
1:02 |
: It’s inexpensive AND delicious
|
1:03 |
: Until then, I have Reinsdorf next to an erupting volcano
|
1:03 |
![]() |
1:04 |
: No, I mean like the projection that they had for them was just completely wrong. Like they projected them to do well and they were terrible or vice versa.
|
1:05 |
: Oh, I get a ton of those every year!
|
1:05 |
: At the median
|
1:05 |
: because, of course, you expect two percent of players to beat their 99th percentile projection or fail to meet their 1st percentile projection
|
1:05 |
: so that’s like 35 hitters and 40 pitchers right there
|
1:05 |
: And I’m asking more career than single season, but if there’s a standout in that I’d be interested as well haha
|
1:05 |
: I don’t actually have THAT tracked
|
1:06 |
: I have a question about how to use your team/player zips forecast data at beginning of year. Is Zips a forecast of fWAR? If not can I use bWAR or fWAR “actuals” to compare to your projections ? Which WAR is best to use to compare ?
|
1:06 |
: ZiPS is kinda in the middle
|
1:06 |
: ZiPS already models a “weak contact ability” which it “gives” back to pitchers above or below their FIP-based WAR
|
1:06 |
: How do I port a statcast number into WAR? If someone has a +10 OAA is that the same as 10 runs which is the same as 1 WAR? Do all the statcast numbers work this way ?
|
1:06 |
: Well, use RAA for that!
|
1:06 |
: Will ZiPS break down when it gets to Yoshida, sputtering, grinding gears and sending up a plume of smoke as it stumbles along trying to reconcile his sudden collapse?
|
1:07 |
: WHY ARE THERE GEARS IN MY COMPUTER WTF POWER SUPPLY DID I PURCHASE FROM YOU CORSAIR
|
1:07 |
: Hope for white Sox fans: even Fred Wilpon eventually sold the team
|
1:07 |
: In a recent chat you suggested that voters might not be that excited by the 40/70 thing. Do you think there’s any chance Betts wins at this point? Are voters taking into account his playing SS/2B/RF and his WAR advantage?
|
1:08 |
: I think it really comes down to WHO is actually voting
|
1:08 |
: I could guess a lot of my colleagues ballots
|
1:08 |
: but I mean 40/70 is exciting because it’s good. But it’s not like an established club
|
1:09 |
: the yankees’ entire lineup of hitters has underperformed their preseason wRC+ zips projections dramatically. overestimating veterans is a known issue with projection systems, but the rookies are more concerning. volpe, peraza, cabrera, wells, and pereira are an average of 40.6 points of wRC+ below their projections.
|
1:09 |
: I don’t have a wRC+ error due to age, as far as I’ve seen
|
1:10 |
: A team having their 10th percentile projection is naturally going to have a lot of guys underperform
|
1:10 |
: Just like every team that wins 105 games will have a lot of guys overperform
|
1:10 |
: Lottery wins almost invariably are having the luckiest days of their lives
|
1:12 |
: How do you feel about DRS Vs statcast data? Is DRS obsolete in your mind ?
|
1:12 |
: ZiPS actually uses a mix
|
1:12 |
: which is mostly Statcast, some DRS, and a little bit of UZR. It actually projects Statcast a bit better than Statcast alone does
|
1:12 |
: Good bourbon IS delicious, but between inflation and the relative increase in popularity in the past few years, it is decidedly less inexpensive than it once was.
|
1:13 |
: AL West prediction please
|
1:13 |
: I predict there will be five teams in the AL West until such time as expansion saddles us unhappily with eight four-team divisions
|
1:14 |
: I miss chicken wings not costing as much as luxury food like steak
|
1:14 |
: HEAR HEAR
|
1:14 |
: Padonia Station in Cockeysville used to have $9.99 all-you-can-eat wings during Monday Night Football, the Super Bowl, and WWE PPVs.
|
1:15 |
: for Super Bowl, we used to go there, eat about 50 wings over the day for $9.99, and fill up on beer.
|
1:15 |
: And there would be $2 pints of SOMETHING good
|
1:16 |
: And the Damon’s in Cockeysville that used to be there, near where the Sizzler is/was and near Andy Nelson’s would have all-you-can-eat ribs for MNF
|
1:17 |
: It was actually really late in the day on 9/11 that I knew 9/11 was happening, because of all-you-can-eat ribs
|
1:18 |
: There were like six or seven of us at Damon’s that night for the first MNF of the season
|
1:18 |
: it was the Broncos/Giants game where Ed McCaffrey shattered his leg and Rodney Williams had that 90 yard punt
|
1:19 |
: and I stayed at Damon’s until midnight drinking Cokes until I sobered up, they had Honey Brown as their beer of the day and I could really knock back a ton of those like they were nothing
|
1:21 |
: I’m not sure that story had a point
|
1:21 |
: But I was thinking of it
|
1:21 |
: Mom tried to call me at 9 AM to tell me something important was happening but I angrily told her I was hungover and trying to sleep and basically hung up on her
|
1:21 |
: does anything have a point?
|
1:21 |
: Not really
|
1:22 |
: She told me that someone had crashed their plane into the WTC, and I thought she meant some idiot in a Piper Cherokee was screwing around and I turned off my ringer so that she stopped bothering me while I was sleeping
|
1:23 |
: So I was basically one of the last people who didn’t live in a jungle to know something was going on that day
|
1:23 |
: I bought a handle of Jim Beam on sale for less than the price of the fifths. That was inexpensive!
|
1:25 |
: On that note, I’m going to head off as I have a piece to finish and I’m sure you’re all bored by this story that didn’t actually have a punchline
|
1:25 |
: but spicyboy got me going with chicken wings for some reason
|
1:25 |
: I miss Padonia Station
|
1:25 |
: it closed down like five or six years ago
|
1:25 |
: re: handle of Jim Beam … I said GOOD bourbon
|
1:25 |
: They surprisingly had really godo cream of crab soup too, which isn’t what you immediately think of with “sports bar”
|
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
More Stories
MLB Insider Says Dodgers ‘Not Close’ on Prospect Capital In Dylan Cease Trade Talks
NL Central Notes: Chourio, Pirates, De La Cruz, Cubs, Glasnow
MLB Insider Thinks It’s a ‘Guarantee’ Dodgers Go Big This Offseason