Today, the New York Giants executed a significant roster change by benching their starting quarterback, Daniel Jones. In this latest adjustment, Jones has been positioned as the third-string quarterback, designated as the emergency quarterback should both Tommy DeVito and Drew Lock sustain injuries during a game. This shift suggests that Jones may have played his final snaps as a Giant, leaving fans to speculate about the future of the team’s quarterback situation.

The decision to elevate Tommy DeVito to the starting role was unexpected, yet it has the potential to appease Giants fans in the short term. If DeVito fails to recapture the impressive performances he delivered in weeks 11, 12, and 14 last season, the Giants are likely to pivot towards Drew Lock. This transition highlights the precarious nature of the quarterback position and the pressure on DeVito to deliver results that can secure his role moving forward.

With the current quarterback landscape becoming clearer for the remainder of the 2024 season, the immediate concern for the Giants revolves around how they plan to address their quarterback situation in the long term. Fans are eager to understand the strategic direction the team will take to ensure a stable and competitive performance from the quarterback position in the upcoming seasons.

(For the purposes of this analysis, we will set aside the notion that either DeVito or Lock could unexpectedly emerge as the long-term solution. Their on-field performance this season will ultimately determine their future with the team.)

The New York Giants have multiple avenues to explore as they seek to resolve their quarterback dilemma. Broadly speaking, they can consider four primary strategies to enhance their roster and ensure a more robust quarterback presence.

• Pursue a Top Quarterback in the Draft — The Giants could aim to select a premier quarterback prospect, such as Cam Ward or Shedeur Sanders. This strategy hinges on the team securing a favorable draft position or finding a trade partner willing to negotiate effectively for a higher pick.
• Acquire a Veteran Quarterback through Trade or Free Agency — This option involves targeting an experienced player capable of leading the team now, like Russell Wilson, or trading for established quarterbacks such as Kirk Cousins or Matt Stafford. These seasoned veterans can provide the Giants with immediate stability and leadership on the field.
• Sign a Bridge Quarterback While Developing a Young Talent — This route suggests bringing in a lower-tier starter like Sam Darnold, Andy Dalton, or even monitoring Mitchell Trubisky from Buffalo. They would serve as a temporary solution, while the coaching staff nurtures a promising talent like Jalen Milroe, Jaxson Dart, Justin Fields, or Trey Lance.
• Hope for Arch Manning’s Availability — This tongue-in-cheek suggestion implies a more passive approach to the quarterback situation. The Giants would focus on improving the rest of their team while banking on a stronger 2025 quarterback class. They would need to position themselves favorably to either draft a top-tier quarterback or trade resources to move up in the draft.

*While the idea of drafting Eli Manning‘s nephew is certainly poetic, there are no guarantees that Arch Manning will declare for the draft in 2025, nor is there substantial evidence he can fulfill the immense expectations set upon him. I mention Arch here as a symbol of hope for Giants fans, anticipating that fortune may favor the team in the coming years.

So, fellow Giants enthusiasts, what strategy would you prefer the Giants to pursue once this season concludes?

Welcome to SB Nation Reacts, a fan survey initiative that gauges opinions across the NFL. Throughout the season, we pose questions to the most engaged New York Giants fans and supporters nationwide. Sign up here to participate in our weekly email surveys.