Q: You guys have actually been checking golf balls for a very long time. What’s the worst ball you’ve checked?

It’s really one that we checked just recently, Snell Prime 3. 0.

Dean most likely has among the very best pedigrees for golf ball style. He was among the co-inventors of the Pro V1, which is the most popular golf ball of perpetuity.

When he initially released with MTBX, it was a hit, right? It checked well for us, however he needed to move factories. More than when. Anybody can make a golf ball actually excellent one time. The distinction is, can you make that very same golf ball a million times as excellent as one? The Snell ball completed 13 out of 100. It is without a doubt the worst scoring golf ball that we’ve ever had at MyGolfSpy.

There’s 2 methods we check golf balls at MyGolfSpy. There’s efficiency and there’s quality assurance. Performance here is robotic checked. Quality control is what we do here called Ball Lab. We have a great deal of expensive equipment that can check size, weight, all those things to make certain individuals are making the very same ball over and over and over.

We purchase balls from numerous sellers also. So we do not get any of these balls from the very same location due to the fact that golf enthusiasts are purchasing them from all over the nation. We shop them from 3 various areas at 3 various times, however we likewise don’t desire the OEM or producer providing the balls to us since that would be an unreasonable benefit.

Here are the 4 reasons that we believe you need to not be playing the Snell Prime 3. 0.

1. Almost all the balls we checked were obese. You might really not even play these balls in a competition. 62 ounces. 20 of the 36 balls we checked were obese, which is without a doubt the most we have actually ever seen.
2. Inconsistent Compression. Theoretically you desire every ball to be the very same compression. That method you go the very same range when you struck the shot. On average of the 36 balls, we had a 17. 8 distinction in compression. That’s the distinction in between a tough ball and a soft ball. You would see significant efficiency ramifications of that on the golf course.
3. Roundness. You desire your golf balls to be round, ideal? So you 6 of the 36 balls were considered not round. Not excellent.
4. Layer concentricity. So geek talk, essentially you’re going to have irregular layers or irregular density from one layer to the next. Once once again, It simply reveals an indication of irregular quality assurance from ball to ball.

This is the worst scoring golf ball that we have actually ever checked. So we will not and cannot suggest that any of our readers head out and purchase these balls up until they enhance the quality assurance of what they’ve started on here.